Dear Jeff Bezos,

New York Times story about lavish custom jets with swiveling leather lounge chairs caught my eye. A sumptuous London showroom recently opened by a private jet broker epitomized sophisticated up-selling. A full-page chart of the top business jets –from $67.4 million to $90 million, give or take — plus a teaser listing of moguls who “count an airplane among their considerable assets” ended the piece.

Which got me to thinking that, if the uber -rich need special guidance in choosing a custom jet, perhaps they could also use advice on other, more unique and enduring ways to invest.

And since you now hit the $100 billion mark, Mr. Bezos, I’m offering some suggestions for you and your fellow gazillionares eager to make a unique and enduring name for themselves in today’s hyper competitive world.

Consider redefining success:

 Instead of the old style money-as-measure, look to how uniquely one can benefit huge populations.

Andrew Carnegie’s creative approach

Part of the last band of plutocrats, Carnegie built public libraries for more than two thousand communities across the country — some 70 percent in small towns where his name was far from a household word – until the libraries appeared. Cost: around $1.3 billion (adjusted for inflation). His lasting cultural legacy also included gifting New York City with Carnegie Hall, now a legendary world-class music venue, and launching what became Carnegie Mellon University.

Ted Turner Tried

Back in 1997, Ted Turner famously goaded fellow multi-billionaire Bill Gates to put some of his money to good use. Turner was giving  $1 billion to the United Nations for programs aiding refugees and children, clearing land mines and fighting disease.

Turner’s donation, among the largest single donations ever, merely represented the interest he would have earned from $3 billion in holdings. ”I’m no poorer than I was 9 months ago, and the world is much better off,” Turner said. ”All I’m giving away with this billion dollars is my nine months’ work.”

”There’s a lot of people who are awash in money they don’t know what to do with,” said Turner, calling on other wealthy Americans to follow his lead.  ”It doesn’t do you any good if you don’t know what to do with it. I have learned the more good that I did, the more money comes in. You have to learn to give. You’re not born as a giver. You’re born selfish.”

Bill Listened

Bill Gates paid attention; by 2007, Bill and his wife Melinda ranked as America’s second most generous philanthropists.

Warren opted to go “hands free”

Warren Buffett, who has pledged to give away 99% of his wealth to philanthropic causes, currently leads the list.   A philanthropist who prefers to entrust his wealth to those he believes will spend it wisely, Buffett briefly made history by donating $37 billion — the largest charitable donation by an individual – to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Buffet distributes much of the rest to the foundations of his children.

One Opportunity for Daring

Philanthropists have supported a university here and a research hospital there,  named for major donors. But you, Mr. Bezos, are uniquely placed to break serious new ground. With one simple charitable act, you could completely change the face of the world’s economy and solidify a unique place as a progressive benefactor.

Consider giving $100,000 to each and every one of your employees. Including contract workers.  Around the world. They’d feel like lottery winners and would be free to pour virtually all that money back into the economy however they chose: Buying a house or paying off a mortgage, student loan or medical bilsl. Purchasing new cars, furniture or appliances. Taking a vacation or who knows what else. This influx of cash into virtually every sector of the economy could have as much impact as the GI bill . . . and provide an action to be examined, studied and talked about for decades.

Tackle a thorny social issue

Not health; Bill and Melinda already staked that one out.

How about homelessness?

Here in the U.S, the number of people without a safe, regular place to sleep has grown for the first time in seven years, says HUD. Which means that on any given night last year, some 554,000 people — roughly the entire population of Seattle — were homeless. Twelve percent are veterans, both men and women. Statistically, one child in every classroom in the nation is “unsheltered” — a bureaucratic term that describes the thousands living on the streets, under freeways, in doorways and fields, parks and abandoned buildings across the country.

Then there’s the Opioid Epidemic. Updating some key component of our outmoded infrastructure. Or consider ridding the entire world of unexploded land mines — a cause Princess Diana was tragically prevented from finishing.

We’re surrounded by problems crying out for courage, money and creative thinking. Just imagine being hailed as the hero who triumphed over these beasts. Isn’t that more exciting than simply sitting on fat balances in Swiss banks or offshore accounts?

Philanthropy takes work, vision and savvy.

No one wants to simply throw money at a problem. You can start small:

Consider picking up the tab when a city you love needs a new hospital, community center or college campus. They’re already busily assessing needs and developing plans while wondering where the dollars may come from.

Or, something larger, like restoring areas ravaged by mountain top coal removal.  Or creating whole new state or national parks. Nature provided the original blueprints.

Challenge Musk and develop new fixes?  

Who’s going to be the first to equip the world’s fleets of cargo carriers with wind and solar, reducing shipping costs as well as noise and air pollution?

Who’s going to import high-speed train technology to connect cities like New York and Chicago?

Who has the savvy and chutzpah to create a public-interest television network modeled on the BBC?

Who will adapt dirigibles to move goods or install solar panels above highways?

Who’s willing to fund a state- or nation-wide Universal Basic Income experiment?

Not just the U.S., but the entire world is crying out for innovative thinking and creative approaches in countless fields; some haven’t even been invented yet.

Ready to man up for a big test?  

What will it take for you, and the other guys with the big bucks —sadly and unsurprisingly, they’re mostly guys — to think beyond their portfolios and risk becoming philanthropic heroes?

You can only fly one private jet at a time, but there are many ways to invest in the world and make changes that last far lifetimes.

Thanks for listening.


After the Salmon Spill

I hope our county commissioners have the courage to simply say “Request Denied” at the September hearing about allowing net pens in the waters off Ediz Hook. Maybe even say “No Way” and cancel the whole deal, after this week’s disastrous accidental release of more than 300,000 Atlantic salmon near the San Juan Islands.

There’s something to be said about not wasting everyone’s time.

Why is Washington the only west coast state that allows net pens in its waters? California, Oregon and Alaska already said NO.

Apparently some political shenanigans, maneuvering and arm-twisting years ago allowed these disease-spreading aquatic feedlots off our shores. But that was then.

Some advocated for net pens because of the half-dozen or so jobs they’d provide. No point in discussing how many such jobs are being turned over to robots.

There’s no place for the bungling, ill-trained and/or incompetent in any positions where they can damage an ecosystem.

There’s no room for error where most salmon runs are at historic lows and our iconic orcas, which depend on salmon, are struggling and dying.

You can’t take back a spill – whether it’s alien penned salmon, oil from a tanker, or oil, gas or bitumen from a pipeline.

There’s no room for error as we’re still struggling to undo mistakes from the past –removing culverts, restoring the flows, meanders and snags of our rivers and streams.

To err is human, but to forgive — not to mention lessen — the damage, may well require divine intervention.


When Men Don Dresses

I’ve long been amused that, when things get serious, men put on dresses. Just think about judges in the courtroom, academics at graduation, monks, most clergy – and of course
the Pope and his colorful retinue. It’s as if men need to dress like women, put on the robes of the Goddess, to feel Her sacred power, to move and act with real authority. Assuming the loving, generous and generative aspects of the feminine requires dressing for the part.

In traditions Continue reading When Men Don Dresses

MythLines 3: This world, the Otherworld, and the anima mundi

Let’s step away from this everyday world for another perspective,

The Art of Enchantment

Continuing on with republishing my series of ‘MythLines’ columns from EarthLines Magazine … here is my offering (slightly expanded for this blog) from Issue 16, in November 2016.

(Featured image by Martin Stranka)

I’ve spent a lot of years studying the psychology of myth. My personal perspectives can be reduced to this, in a slightly oversimplified nutshell: Sigmund Freud’s theories on anything – inevitably, interminably, explaining everything in sexual terms – rarely interest me much at all; Carl Jung is marvelous (an inexhaustible, treasure-filled, deep well) but often a little too human-centred for my tastes; archetypal psychologist James Hillman takes psychology and mythology out of our heads and back into the world again, and so is always to be revered.

View original post 2,107 more words

What can we bank on?

Not long ago, banks and banking were yawn-inducing synonyms for grey flannel boring. Then came the orgy of reckless greed that precipitated the global financial meltdown. Now banking is back in the news in surprising ways: Continue reading What can we bank on?